Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 486-487

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

No marks in A (→GE)

Different accents in FE, literal reading

Short accents in EE

Long accents suggested by the editors

..

There is no reason to doubt the authenticity of the accents added in the proofreading of FE (→EE) on in bar 486 and on in bar 487. In turn, it is not clear what kind of accents Chopin had in mind, since it is difficult to assume that he would have liked to differentiate between them. According to us, it is long accents that are more likely, since a shift of the shorter sign (in bar 486) may indicate that the accent written by Chopin was longer than the one printed in FE. However, it is only a suspicion, hence both the long accents suggested in the main text and the short accents in EE may be considered equal variants.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 487

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

Long accent in A, literal reading

Short accent in A (possible interpretation→GEFEEE)

..

The accent in A at the beginning of the bar, considered in the context of this bar, is long, yet compared with the marks in the two previous bars, it may also be interpreted as a short one.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents

b. 494-501

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

8 long accents in A

7 short & 1 long accents in GE1

7 short accents in FE

8 short accents in EE & GE2

..

Out of eight long accents written in A, GE1 reproduced in this form only the mark in bar 497, which is naturally an accidental inaccuracy. The mark in this bar is slightly longer also in FE (→EE); however, the difference is so small that it is difficult to consider it meaningful. In GE2 all accents were unified.
FE omitted the last mark, in bar 501, most probably due to an oversight. The accent was added in EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions

b. 506

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

Staccato dots in A & GE2

No marks in GE1 (→FEEE)

..

The missing staccato dots over the 4th and 7th quavers in GE1 (→FEEE) must be an oversight. The signs were added in GE2

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 508

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

In FE, the staccato dot over awas placed by mistake only over the 5th quaver. Other mistakes of FE in the final passage – see bars 506-510 and 508-509.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE