|
b. 196
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The slur of GE1 (→FE→EE), contrary to the unquestionable notation of A, probably stems from a misunderstanding of the notation of A in the previous bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 196
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||
|
b. 196
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 197-199
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The slurs of GE1 (→FE→EE) are a characteristic example of a schematic approach to slurs – two whole-bar slurs were printed instead of the precisely written Chopin phrase mark. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 197-198
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The slurs in the L.H. added in GE1 (→FE→EE) are most probably inauthentic – the division on the bar line (after the slurs in the R.H.) certainly is not in line with Chopin's intention. Assuming that a possible Chopin proof entry in GE1 was implemented inaccurately, one could consider the slur of GE2 to be in line with his intention. However, it would be then obscure why Chopin did not order to correct the slurs in the R.H. at that time. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
before f2.
