data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The eight-note figure filling the 3rd quaver of the bar was written in A by Chopin as a demisemiquaver septuplet. The patent mistake was partially corrected in GE2, by writing it as an octuplet of demisemiquavers. According to us, there are no reasons for such an atypical notation, hence we replace the septuplet with a regular group of hemidemisemiquavers. In FE (→EE) the second note was overlooked, which removed the incompatibility of the notation with the actual state. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A |
||||||
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
On the 3rd beat of the bar GE1 contains up to three errors:
Only the first two were corrected in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
It was probably the lack of the triplet marking over the first group of semiquavers that induced the reviser of EE to arbitrarily change the rhythm. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Omission of the accent in the editions can be considered justified if we take into consideration that, theoretically, it applies to the note that is not played at all, since it is sustained with a tie. From the practical point of view, the trill makes it possible for it to be accented, hence in the main text we suggest the sign in a variant form. It may also be that the missing accent is a result of the engraver's oversight or possibly of an editorial revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
It is hard to assume whether the missing accent in FE (→EE) is one of the results of the Chopin proofreading on the 3rd beat of the bar, or whether it is only its unintended side effect or simply an oversight of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |