data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 78
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In A one can see a pitch correction of the trilled crotchet, from b category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A |
||||||||
b. 79
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The slur of GE1 (→FE→EE) is certainly inaccurate – it perfectly shows the disrespectful attitude of the engraver of GE1 to the Chopin slurring. The inaccuracy was partially corrected in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 79
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In the 2nd half of the bar, both the absence of the first two staccato dots in GE (→FE→EE) and an additional dot over the demisemiquaver in EE is certainly a result of an inaccurate work of the engravers. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 79
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Reproducing the accent in the editions as short is certainly a result of an inaccurate interpretation of A by the engraver of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The eight-note version, written in A (→GE), is, in spite of the mistake in determining the number of notes – see the adjacent note – the most certain both as far as the sources and style are concerned. The seven-note version of FE (→EE) may be a result of Chopin's proofreading, which is indicated by his unquestionable interventions on the 3rd and 4th beat of the bar. However, the latter left visible traces in print, whereas no such traces are to be found in the discussed place. Therefore, we also have to take into consideration a possibility of an erroneously left out c2 in this figure. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |