b. 72
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The missing sign in GE1 (→FE→EE) is certainly an oversight of the engraver of GE1. The mistake was corrected in GE2 after A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , No pedal release mark |
|||||||||
b. 72-74
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In A there is no octave sign over the entire sequence of chords written with small notes. The patent mistake was corrected already in GE1 (→GE2,FE→EE), which could have been a result of Chopin's proofreading (however, the correction could have also been implemented by the reviser, since due to the overlapping of the hands, the mistake is evident). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of A , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Interpretation of three accents written in A at the beginning of the bar is problematic, which could have been the reason they were omitted in GE1 (→FE→EE). In the main text we suggest a solution in which the first two signs are reproduced without changes and the third is interpreted as diminuendo, which, undoubtedly, is required here between the accent at the beginning of the bar, which ends the two-bar crescendo, and the after the last trill. In GE2 only one accent was reproduced, corresponding to the first two in the notation of A. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 72-74
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The missing slur in GE1 (→FE→EE) is certainly an oversight, completed in GE2 after A. The same slur was added in GE2 also in the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 73
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The Chopin fingering is probably written with a pupil's hand. category imprint: Differences between sources |