Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 45-52

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

Accompaniment in FES, literal interpretation

Accompaniment in FES, contextual interpretation

Version of remaining sources

..

In FES Chopin wrote a simplified reduction of the recitative's orchestral accompaniment, which can be used while performing this movement solo. The accompaniment is to be played with the L.H. instead of the original part and in few places also the part of the R.H. was completed. In bars 45-47 the notation is most probably inaccurate – the applied abbreviation, when interpreted literally, orders striking the bass in the bottom octave (A1), which is both sonically unjustified and technically uncomfortable (cf. similar inaccuracies in the Etude in A major, Op. 25 No. 1, bars 1-8 and the Nocturne in D major, Op. 27 No. 2, bar 1).

After choosing the version with the harmonic accompaniment, it may be necessary to select relevant versions also in bars 45 (pedal), 46 (staccato dots), 47-48 (slurs), 51 (slurs) and 52 (slurs and staccato signs).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Authentic post-publication changes and variants

b. 45

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

 in A (→GE1)

 in FE (→EE) & GE2

 in FES

..

The sign of pedal release, written in A (→GE1) contrary to the rules of harmonic pedalling, generally used by Chopin, may be inaccurate. Therefore, in the main text we give the sign on the basis of FE.
The harmonic accompaniment written in FES certainly requires a different pedalling than the one marked in the remaining sources. In particular, in this place the entry suggests releasing the pedal at the end of the previous bar (and probably pressing the pedal at the beginning of the discussed bar).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A

b. 45

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

Accent in A

 in GE (→FEEE)

..

The unquestionable long accent in A under the bquaver started in the editions (certainly contrary to Chopin's intention) clearly earlier.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents

b. 46

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

Dots in R.H. in A

No marks in GE1 (→FEEE)

Dots in both hands in GE2

..

In the entire fragment of the recitative nature, Chopin generally writes articulation markings separately for each hand. The missing staccato dots in the L.H. at the end of the bar is one of the exceptions, probably resulting from inaccuracy. In the editions the dots were overlooked in the R.H. too, which could have been a consequence of Chopin's proofreading. Taking into account a possibility of the engraver's mistake, in the main text we adhere to the version of A, adding dots also in the L.H.

If in bar 45 the version with the harmonic accompaniment was chosen, one of two first source versions is to be selected here.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 47

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

..

In GE (→FEstaccato dots were placed also over the first two semiquavers in the L.H., which is a patent mistake. In EE and GE2 dots were added also in the R.H., certainly contrary to Chopin's intention: it is difficult to imagine that Chopin could have overlooked the dots twice (in the R.H. and in the L.H.).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE