b. 36-37
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In A one can see an extension of the slur; initially, it embraced only the 2nd half of bar 36. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A |
|||||||||||
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The graphic separation of the middle voice of the last three chords with a separate beam comes from us. It was necessary to indicate that the sign applies to this progression; the sign was written by Chopin in A between the notes of the chords in a way impossible to be reproduced in print. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The sign of an accent in GE1 is doubly inaccurate: short and placed after the chord it concerns in the very legible notation of A. Overlooked in FE (→EE), it was moved to the right place in GE2 (without changes in shape). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
GE misreproduced the indication as radoscendo. The correct spelling appears in a proofreading of FE (→EE), perhaps as a result of Chopin's intervention. (The contemporary Italian orthography requires it to be spelled with a double "d": raddolcendo). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The accent in A is only slightly longer than the adjacent ones, hence it is not entirely certain whether Chopin meant a long accent here. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in A |