|
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The inaccurate, too long slur of GE1 was misinterpreted in FE as clearly reaching the c2 quaver. The mistake was not repeated either in EE or in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
At the beginning of the bar A (→GE→FE→EE) does not have the 8 digit, marking the bottom note of the octave, E
category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
According to us, the use of the semiquaver beam in the editions is a result of inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1. In A similar groups are written as quavers in all three analogous bars (bars 14, 33 and 82) and it does not seem that Chopin would have preferred to change this notation. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Both versions of the slur, appearing in the editions, are almost certainly inauthentic. The version of GE1 (→FE) is most probably simply inaccurate, similarly the version of EE. In turn, in GE2 it is probably an attempt to reinterpret the notation of A while taking into account the Chopin notation of analogous bars 14 and 82. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Although the beginning of the slur in A from the 2nd quaver remains beyond any doubt, in GE1 (→FE→EE) it was erroneously reproduced as a whole-bar slur. The notation compatible with A was restored in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
1. Since at the first appearance of this phrase in bar 14 Chopin added it in 
