Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Slurs

b. 65-66

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

Slur up to crotchet in A, contextual interpretation

Slur up to end of bar in A (literal reading→GEFEEE)

..

It is uncertain whether the slur of A (→GE1) written in bar 65 is supposed to reach the beginning of bar 66 or not. In the main text we adopt the first possibility due to a number of corrections visible in A, in which the slurs were extended to the note ending the phrase, falling at the beginning of the bar (e.g. in bars 36-37 and 41-42).
In the remaining editions the slur ends with the last semiquaver in bar 65 and in EE and GE2 an analogous slur for the L.H. was added.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions

b. 66-67

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

Slur in A

Slurs in GE (→FEEE)

..

The additional slur in bar 66 is, according to us, a remaining part of a simplified or unfinished Chopin proofreading of GE1. It was most probably aimed at restoring the slur written in A, initially misinterpreted in print. Doubling the slurs in the part of the L.H. – see bars 66-69.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE

b. 66-69

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

No slurs in A

L.H. slurs in GE (→FEEE)

..

The slurs in the L.H. in bars 66-67 and 69, although they could have been added by Chopin in the proofreading of GE1, are, however, most probably an editorial revision. In both cases, the slurs of the R.H., whose compliance with Chopin's intention seems to be highly questionable, were doubled – see notes to bars 66-67 and 69-70.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 68-69

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

Slur in A (literal reading→GE1FE)

Slur in A, contextual interpretation

Slurs in EE & GE2 (in both hands)

..

The slur of A ends still in bar 68, yet its shape does not exclude the intention of leading it to the beginning of the next bar, where the phrase ends. According to us, this is how the sign is to be interpreted – cf. a similar situation at the end of bar 65. The editions adopted the literal interpretation of the slur and EE and GE2 added an analogous slur in the part of the L.H.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 69-70

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

Slur in A, literal reading

Slur in A, probable interpretation

Slur in GE (→FEEE)

..

When interpreted literally, the slur beginning in the half of bar 69 reaches the 2nd grace note in bar 70, which, however, cannot be musically explained, since the grace notes constitute the beginning of a trill. Therefore, we assume that it reaches further, to the trilled minim e2. On the other hand, it seems to be possible that Chopin meant a slur embracing the 1st minim only, ending the roulade in the previous bar. In GE1 and in the remaining sources, the slur embraces only the 2nd half of bar 69, which almost certainly does not correspond to Chopin's intention – adjusting slurs (as well as dynamic hairpins) to the main rhythmic units (e.g. bars or groups embraced with a beam) is a characteristic, routine manner of the engravers of GE. The slur was also added in the part of the L.H., which in this situation is most probably an arbitrary change.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions