mUltimate Chopin

Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Slurs

b. 89

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

2 slurs in A

1 slur in GE (→FE→EE)
..

In the main text we give the slurs that Chopin wrote in A, yet the slur of GE (→FE→EE) can be considered an equal variant: 

  • in similar figures in bars 7-8 and analog. Chopin would generally put one slur;
  • the slur of the editions could have been added by Chopin in the proofreading of GE1, e.g. if, initially, the engraver generally overlooked slurs in this place.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Authentic corrections of GE

b. 89-90

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

Continuous slur in A

2 slurs in GE (→FE→EE)
..

The fact of breaking the slur in the editions is certainly an example of the manner of the engraver of GE1, who would avoid long slurs and adjust them to metric structures, in this case bars – see also bars 90-91.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 90-91

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

Slur up to bar 91 in A

Shorter slur in GE (→FE→EE)
..

A shorter slur in GE (→FE→EE) – contrary to the unequivocal notation of A – is certainly a result of inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE