Issues : Errors in GE
|
b. 106-107
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The visible in A, characteristic Chopin tie of c1 was overlooked in GE – the engraver may have considered it an extension of the motivic slur. Chopin corrected the mistake when proofreading FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 109
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
GE has an additional note, c1, in the crotchet chord. The notation of A may be misleading here, yet Chopin's having deleted the note in the proofreading of FE (→EE1) is decisive. In EE2 (→EE3) the note was added under the influence of GE1. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE , Uncertain notes on ledger lines , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||
|
b. 109-111
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slurs over the pairs of chords at the transition between bars 109 and 110 and 110 and 111 were overlooked or inaccurately reproduced in the majority of the editions. GE1 includes a slur under notes in bars 110-111. It is uncertain whether it is a misread slur introduced by Chopin in the proofreading of GE1 as a tie of f. In FE (→EE) there are no slurs mentioned above, whereas GE2 restored the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 117
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 120
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
GE1 (→FE→EE) overlooked the tie of e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
1, probably due to a misunderstanding of the notation of