|
b. 110-111
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing tie of f is probably an oversight of Chopin in A (→GE). It is indicated by the tie of this note in an analogous situation in the previous bar and it is confirmed by the Chopin proofreading of FE (→EE). After all, who knows whether the slur led under notes, combining the last chord in bar 110 with the first one in 111, is not an echo of the Chopin proofreading too: Chopin, as was his custom, could have written a short tie next to the target note, whereas the engraver of GE1 interpreted it as a motivic slur (see the note in bars 109-110). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 110
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The long accent over the penultimate semiquaver was erroneously reproduced in GE1 as a short accent under the last note. In FE (→EE) the accent was placed under the 1st note of the last four semiquavers, which may be a result of Chopin's proofreading. In the main text we give the version of A, since it is uncertain whether Chopin actually changed his mind on accents in the ending of this bar; even if it was him that corrected the text of FE in this place, he would be changing the erroneous accent adopted from GE1 and not the text of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 110-111
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The notation of A is inconclusive on whether the slurs are to be separated between the bars. The slur in bar 110, the last one on the page, reaches beyond the bar line, although it is not clearly visible due to ending ink. A possible continuation of the slur is rather not confirmed by the slur in bar 111, which, although running high over the first semiquavers, suggests with its shape the beginning of a new sign. According to us, both interpretations are equal and in the main text we adopt the solution clearly written in an analogous situation one bar earlier. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||||||||
|
b. 110
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur over the first two semiquavers, visible in A, was overlooked in the editions: the engraver of GE1 may have considered it an insignificant, accidental touch of quill. According to us, such a possibility is viable, hence we do not include it in the main text. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||||||||
|
b. 111
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |
