Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 12-13
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur written in A stayed in GE (→FE→EE) next to note heads, which perhaps may have induced Chopin to add a second slur, embracing also the preceding crotchet. According to us, the slur was probably supposed to replace the previous one. A probability of Chopin's proofreading is also indicated by a possible trace of correcting the previous slur in bar 12. However, not being certain of the authorship of these changes, in the main text we leave the version of A. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE , Corrected slurs of Op. 21 in GE1 |
|||||||||||
|
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slurs of GE1 (→FE→EE) may be partially considered a result of Chopin's intervention: the slur running from the 2nd quaver could have been added as a probably simplified correction of the erroneous, too short slur in the 2nd half of the bar. Apart from the literal interpretation of this slurring, we suggest another two possible interpretations. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
A (→GE1) includes a repeated category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The earlier beginning of the slur in GE1 (→FE→EE) is certainly erroneous and it was corrected in GE2 after A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
before the top note of the octave. The superfluous sign was removed in 
