|
b. 63-64
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur, started in A in bar 63, the last on the page, was not finished on a new page. According to us, one should assume that Chopin's intention was to write in the part of the L.H. a slur of the same range as in the complete slur of the R.H. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , Errors of A |
||||||||
|
b. 71-72
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The lack – total or partial – of pedalling markings is undoubtedly a result of an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE) and the reviser of GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 71-72
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Short accents in EE is an inaccuracy resulting from not using the sign of a long accent. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
|
b. 71
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1 and in the remaining editions, the slur starts – contrary to A – only from the 1st semiquaver. The reason for this inaccuracy were most probably difficulties of a graphic character: moving the beginning of the slur facilitates a legible placement of all elements of notation accumulated in this space (inscriptions, an octave sign, a phrase mark, a tie, notes over the stave). Both notations are practically equal, hence we do not consider the difference to be an actual variant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |
only in 
