|
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The typical long accent visible in A was falsely reproduced in the editions as a diminuendo hairpin, which would frequently happen in Chopin's works – cf. e.g. the Etude in A minor, Op. 10 No. 2, bar 8 and 12. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur of GE (→FE) is probably a result of a schematic interpretation of the notation of A, although from the musical point of view, it is absolutely possible. A shortened slur in EE is certainly an arbitrary revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||||
|
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Omission of the staccato dots by the engraver of GE1 can be understood, since they are poorly visible in A, particularly the second one that blends in with the ending of the stem of the chord in the R.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The staccato dot on the last crotchet is certainly a mistake of the engraver of GE1. The error was not repeated in any of the remaining editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
in 
