b. 238
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we preserve the cautionary (?) , present in all sources, before a1 as a proof of the Chopin way of thinking. However, the reason for its introduction is unclear – Chopin may have simply followed an analogy with bars 230 and 236, in which the corresponding semiquaver is a g1, always written with a . category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||
b. 239
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of is one of many oversights of GE1 (→FE→EE) in this and the previous bars. The sign was restored in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 239
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats before the E-e octave. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 240
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing asterisk in A is undoubtedly a mistake – this kind of oversights would happen to Chopin on a number of occasions, and the end of a page always fosters inaccuracies. The total oversight of the second pedal in this bar in GE1 (→FE→EE) is also to be considered a mistake – there is no reason to use a different pedalling in the ending of this bar than in three previous analogous bars 234, 236 and 238. GE2 added both a and a . In this context, the placement of the sign adopted there is the only reasonable one, hence we give this version in the main text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , No pedal release mark , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
b. 240
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions |