b. 234
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The first two accents in A (→GE1) are clearly long, whereas the next two look like short ones, which, according to us, is an inaccuracy – see bar 226. Both accents are actually written after the note, which was one of the manner of writing long accents in Chopin's previous pieces – cf. bar 230. It is also worth mentioning that the accent on the f1 semiquaver played in the L.H. is even shorter. Unification of the accents in the remaining editions is an arbitrary decision of the engravers of revisers. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||||||||||
b. 234-240
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Overlooking four accents for the semiquavers in the L.H. in bars 234, 236, 238 and 240 is certainly a mistake of GE1 (→FE→EE). The signs were returned in GE2, but only in bars 238 and 240. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 235
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
 
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||||||||
b. 235-236
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur in these bars was reproduced in GE1 (→FE→EE) very inaccurately – it starts already from the chord at the beginning of the bar, and further on it is divided into three sections embracing bar 235 and each halves of bar 236. The correct notation was returned in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 236-240
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
All accents in the R.H. in bars 236, 238 and 240 are clearly written and they are undoubtedly long accents. In spite of this, in GE1 the signs in bar 238 were overlooked, whereas the remaining ones were reproduced inaccurately – the last two accents in bar 236 and the last one in bar 240 are short. In FE and EE bar 238 was left without signs, whereas the notation of the remaining ones was distorted – in bar 236 the first accent became a embracing three (FE) or four (EE) semiquavers, whereas the second one was overlooked; in bar 240, EE used vertical accents. In GE2, all accents of A in these bars were reproduced as short ones. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |