Pedalling
b. 185-188
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we suggest adding pedalling after authentic indications in analogous bars 57-60. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||||
b. 189-192
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we give the pedalling added by Chopin in GC and repeated more or less accurately in GE and EE2. As the added pedalling differs from the indications in the analogous fragment of the exposition (bars 61-64), which may have resulted from haste at the time of writing it, we suggest a pedalling based on the indications of the exposition as an alternative. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||||||
b. 193-197
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The pedalling of this fragment was added by Chopin in GC (→GE). It was also repeated in EE2, almost certainly after GE1. See also bars 198-204. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||||||
b. 198-204
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
in bar 198 is the last sign of pedalling, added and non-deleted by Chopin in GC (in the middle of the next bar one can see a deleted sign, which could have been a asterisk). It is hard to decide what the reason for stopping the entries could have been, yet the most likely answer seems to be distraction. In any case, it certainly does not mean that one should stop using the pedal. In the main text we add indications on the basis of the authentic pedalling in similar bars 70-80. In GE1 the last written sign was considered to be a mistake and hence omitted, it was however reinstated in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , No pedal release mark , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||||||
b. 226
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
GE omitted the sign. It resulted from a misreading of GC – the sign is written there so negligently that it can be mistaken for a indication (see one of the earlier notes). Curiously, The error was overlooked by GE2 – it neither added a sign nor removed the placed later in this bar. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |