b. 226
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
GE omitted the sign. It resulted from a misreading of GC – the sign is written there so negligently that it can be mistaken for a indication (see one of the earlier notes). Curiously, The error was overlooked by GE2 – it neither added a sign nor removed the placed later in this bar. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
|||
b. 226
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The indication here results from a mistake by the engraver of GE1, who interpreted thus the sign hurriedly written in GC. The erroneous indication was repeated in EE2. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||
b. 228-229
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In GE this bar ends the line, and the opening fragment of the slur which starts from the G1-G octave, falling in this bar, is mistakenly omitted. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
|||
b. 229
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
FE has an G1-F seventh as the 2nd quaver. The mistake was not noticed in any of the proofreadings, it was, however, corrected in EE, which could have been performed by the reviser. GC (→GE) features the correct text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||
b. 230-231
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In GC – undoubtedly in accordance with [A] – the part of the L.H. is written in these bars in an abbreviated manner, as repetition of bar 229. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated notation of A |