|
b. 232-234
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The version of FE is most probably accidental – the engraver forgot about the dashes in the new line of the text. The addition in EE may come from Chopin, although it cannot be excluded that according to Chopin, the crescendo was supposed to be led until category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||
|
b. 232-234
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
Before the top note of the last octave in bar 232 and the 2nd one in bar 234, there are no accidentals in GC and the earlier FE. The necessary signs – category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||
|
b. 232
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In all sources, there is a repeated category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||
|
b. 234
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
We add cautionary naturals to f1-f2 in the main text. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 234
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of the accent in GE1 is certainly an engraver's mistake – missing are also a L.H. slur and the pedalling. The error was corrected in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
in bar 239.
of f
and 
of b – were added in 
