b. 221
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Errors of GC |
||||||||||||||
b. 222-224
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The missing accent in bar 223 could be considered to be an inaccuracy of the engraver of FE, if it were not for Chopin proofreading of the analogous fragment of the exposition, in which he removed, among others, the counterpart of the accent (see bars 93-96). On the other hand, the authenticity of three accents of GC does not raise any doubts, whereas the third accent added in EE may come from Chopin. Therefore, in the main text we suggest variant solutions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||||||
b. 225
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
There is no reason to doubt the authenticity of the staccato dot which could have been written by Chopin into GC or even occur already in [A], but be overlooked by the engraver of FE. The lack of the sign in GE is certainly an oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||||||
b. 226
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In the last chord, GC has an f instead of e. The mistake was corrected in GE, the remaining editions also include the correct text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||||||||||
b. 226-228
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
There are differences between the editions, as far as the presence of accents under the bass octaves is concerned:
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , Errors repeated in EE |