EE1
compare
b. 226
The indication here results from a mistake by the engraver of GE1, who interpreted thus the sign hurriedly written in GC. The erroneous indication was repeated in EE2.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in GE, Inaccuracies in GC
notation: Verbal indications