



b. 1
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , 4/4 or 2/2 |
|||||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: No initial dynamic marking , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||||
b. 1-2
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The slur embracing the bass motif, visible in GC (→GE), was probably overlooked by the engraver of FE1 (→FE2→EE1). It was then added in the proofreading of FE3 (→FE4), probably as a result of Chopin's intervention. The sign was also added in EE2.
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 2-3
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, out of two sources based directly on [A] – GC and FE – it is the copy that may convey a more accurate representation of this place in the autograph, since the text in FE is too tightly packed. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In FE1 there is no top note of the chord, d
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |