b. 70
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III
..
The signs in GC and FE may be considered to be equal variants. Due to the reasons discussed in bar 16, in the main text we give the version of FE. The absence of the sign in GE1 is a clear mistake, inaccurately (arbitrarily) corrected in the subsequent GE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 70-78
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III
..
In [A] (→GC,FE) Chopin overlooked the bass clef at the end of bars 70 and 78. The signs were added in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 71
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III
..
FE1 overlooked the middle notes of the chord in the R.H. on the 3rd beat of the bar. The mistake was corrected already in FE2. See also the next note. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 71
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III
..
In FE1 and subsequent impressions of FE of the entire Sonata, f2 on the 4th beat of the bar was overlooked. The mistake remained without correction also in EE, in turn, it was corrected in FE5, probably on the basis of comparison with analogous bars 17, 25 and 79. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 71-72
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we include the pair of dynamic hairpins, most probably written by Chopin in the base text to EE1. The fact that the sign in bar 72 has a clearly different form than in bars 18 and 26 proves the authenticity of these additions – the revisers would generally unify analogous places. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of EE |