|
b. 97
|
composition: Op. 64 No 1, Waltz in D♭ major
..
No pedalling signs in this bar is probably a result of Chopin's oversight in A in bar 25 (all subsequent repetitions of this phrase are only signalised as repetitions of this bar). The signs were added in EE, they are also – in bar 25 – in AI. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 97-119
|
composition: Op. 64 No 1, Waltz in D♭ major
..
In A bars 97-107 and 113-119 are written in an abbreviated manner as repetition of bars 25-35 and 25-31 respectively. Chopin used empty bars, provided with subsequent letters of alphabet, however, he introduced a dynamic hairpin. In the first section it coincides exactly with the one present in bars 25-53, yet in the second it does not. The engraver of FE did not understand it or ignored it, as he did not include the signs that were written here – see bars 113-116 and 117-118. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
||||||
|
b. 106
|
composition: Op. 64 No 1, Waltz in D♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 106-107
|
composition: Op. 64 No 1, Waltz in D♭ major
..
In As in bars 33-35 an alternative version of the part of the L.H. is written, which, due to the whole-bar rest in bar 34, seems to announce the final version of the ending of the Waltz. Taking this into account, in our reconstruction of the notation of As, we suggest this variant of accompaniment precisely in bars 105-107 (the notation of As indicates that at the stage of sketching the Waltz, Chopin did not envision a repetition corresponding to bars 109-124 in the reprise). The provided variant includes two bars only, as the described version of As in bar 33 does not differ from the final version of bar 105. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||
|
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 64 No 1, Waltz in D♭ major
..
The accent visible in A has a typical form of long accents. In spite of this, in FE it was reproduced as a short one. The sign in EEW1 (→EEW2) has to be considered to be long, yet the coincidence with the notation of A is most probably accidental. The omission of the accent in GE may be considered to be an oversight, however, it is surprising that the sign is absent in both versions of GE, particularly considering the fact that the same applies to category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , EE inaccuracies |
1 in 
in the next bar. Therefore, both indications may have been overlooked already in