b. 26
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The fingering numeral, present in GC and EE, was overlooked in GE. Its absence in FE is certainly a result of an oversight too. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we include the staccato dot present in FE. The sign was added also in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The long accent, present only in GC (→GE1), could have been added there by Chopin. In GE2 (→GE3) it was replaced with a standard, short accent. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Long accents , GE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||
b. 27-28
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In GC (→GE) accents on the 4th beat of these bars were probably added by Chopin. EE3 repeated them, probably on the basis of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||
b. 27-30
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In the passages including a few octaves, there are no accidentals in the sources, which, however, does not raise doubts concerning the text intended by Chopin.
In GC there are no sharps needed in the notation of f1, f2 in bar 27, f, f1, f2 in bar 28, f2, f1 (L.H.), c1 in bar 29 and f, d2 in bar 30. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of GC |