Issues : Errors of GC
|
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
GC (→GE1) features naturals before b3 and a3 in the 3rd group of semiquavers. These unnecessary signs are remnants of the erroneously repeated 2nd group of semiquavers in this place. The mistake was corrected, by changing only the elements influencing the correctness of the text – pitch of the notes, category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||
|
b. 10
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The long accent was probably overlooked in GC (→GE). Similarly in analogous bar 74, in which, however, the sign is present only in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
|||
|
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In the 2nd half of the bar, the only accidental in the part of the R.H. in GC, FE and EE1 is a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of GC |
|||
|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In GC and FE there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of GC |
|||
|
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
Lack of the '5' digit over the 7th semiquaver in GC (→GE) is certainly an oversight of the copyist. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
to 
before the 3rd note. In 
3. The notation, although inaccurate, determines also the sound of the 6th and 10th semiquavers in the 2nd half of the bar as d
) as resolution. The sharps raising the discussed notes to f
