Issues : Omissions to cancel alteration
|
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
In AW, GC, FE and EE1 (→EE2), there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
In GC (→GE1), FE and EE1 there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||
|
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
The notation of this bar is erroneous or inaccurate in the majority of the sources. Most probably, Chopin, writing this fragment in [A] for the third time (after analogous bars 6 and 25), had already such a strong correlation of the notes with the proper sound that he did not notice the missing
The cautionary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of A , Errors of GC |
returning b
2. This characteristic for Chopin mistake was corrected in the remaining sources. In the repetition of this phrase in bar 23 the error appears only in 
before the 4th quaver. Cancelling this alteration was, as usual, obvious, hence it was not marked even when the composer would correct the notation of this bar in