|
b. 37-38
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
The accents of AW may be considered as complementary in relation to the indications of the version prepared for print. However, it is possible that Chopin thought them to be superfluous after writing pedalling in this place, particularly poco a poco cresc. in bars 36-37. Therefore, in the main text we leave their use at the discretion of the performer. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 37-38
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
Lack of pedalling in AW and CDP suggests it having been added by Chopin at the time of developing manuscripts intended for base texts to the editions. This hypothesis is confirmed by Chopin's hand visible in an entry in GC. Similarly in bars 41-42. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
The poorly visible dash in AW is probably a fingering numeral. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 37-38
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
The fingering written here to FED may be connected both with the fingers indicated further in this source and with these resulting from the numeral written over the 10th quaver of the bar in AW – see the adjacent note. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 37-38
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
It is the only in this Etude example of different fingering written by Chopin in different sources. Possible reconstruction of both fingering versions:
FED category imprint: Differences between sources |
.