mUltimate Chopin

Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 31

composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

No pedalling in the sources

Our variant suggestion
..

In the main text we suggest to complete the pedalling after a possible Chopin proofreading of FE in analogous bar 12.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Omitted correction of an analogous place

b. 32

composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

No markings in AW & CDP

Pedalling in GC (→GE), FE & EE
..

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections in GC

b. 33-50

composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

..

AT does not include this part of the Etude.

category imprint:

b. 35-36

composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

No markings in AW & CDP

Pedalling in bar 35 in GC (→GE) & EE

Pedalling in bars 35-36 in FE
..  

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 36-37

composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

No indication in AW

in CDP, GC (→GE), FE & EE
..

Chopin added the dynamic indication only in [A], yet still early enough for it to be copied both in CDP and in GC, and most probably also in the second, lost Stichvorlage copy. Similarly in bars 39-40. In turn, Chopin abandoned the agogic change in the final version – see bars 38-40. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations