



b. 15
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
In A, CDP, and FE, there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
||||||||||
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
An accurate determination of the range of category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , Unclear hairpins in A |
||||||||||
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
The sign in A may be considered as a long accent, yet according to us, it is much more likely that Chopin had diminuendo hairpins in mind, closing the dynamic wave in this bar. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
In A, CDP, FE, and EE1, there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A |
||||||||||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
The version with the five-note group was created as a result of Chopin correction in A – the composer deleted the last G semiquaver there. We consider this change to be final due to its undeniable advantages – the transition to the next bar is significantly smoother, as far as the harmony (preparing a new chord position), rhythm (transition to a new rhythmic formula), and piano technique (facilitating the change of the hand's position) are concerned. A similar change was introduced – probably at Chopin's request – in bar 34. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |