Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
|
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
In A, CDP, and FE, there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
||||||
|
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
In the majority of the sources, there are inaccuracies concerning the notation of accidentals, not having an impact on the interpretation of the text. In AI, A (→CDP) and FE, there are no naturals before the 3rd note in the L.H. (a) and the 4th note in the R.H. (e1), while in EE1, there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||
|
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
The too early placed category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
|
b. 40-42
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
The dim. indication could have been added in A after preparing CDP. Lack of the dashes determining the range of its indication in FE is probably a result of the engraver's inaccuracy. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
|
b. 48
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
Taking into account the span of the chord in the L.H., lack of arpeggio next to the chord must be considered as an inaccuracy of notation. In turn, the arpeggio in the R.H. could have been added by Chopin in the base text to EE, although the revision of the editor is also possible. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |
raising d
1 to d1. This patent oversight was corrected in 
before the 3rd note in the R.H. (c
2). 
in 
