Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 1

composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major

No anacrusis in AI

Anacrusis in A (→CDP,GE), FE & EE

..

Lack of upbeat in AI is characteristic for the original versions – cf., e.g., the autograph of the first edition of the Mazurka in A major, Op. 7 No. 4 or the album autograph of the initial theme of the Nocturne in F minor, Op. 55 No. 1. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Main-line changes , Changed phrase length

b. 1

composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major

..

In both autographs the moment of starting the slur is not entirely clear. In the case of AI we can rely only on a photography, hence, there is no certainty whether all details of the original are clearly visible on it (it is possible that, e.g., the initial fragment of the slur was written with such a delicate line that it is invisible on the photography). According to us, in both cases there is no doubt that, as far as the shape of the slur is concerned, Chopin wanted to begin the slur in the most natural way possible in this context, i.e. from the beginning of the phrase, hence from the beginning of bar 1 in AI and from the upbeat in A (this is how it was interpreted in GE). Such an interpretation of A is confirmed by the slurs of FE and EE, based on other manuscripts.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Pointing slurs

b. 1

composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major

sotto voce in AI

 in A (→GE), FE & EE

..

Preparing the Etude for print, Chopin decided to choose .

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

b. 1

composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major

Title in AI & CDP

Title & dedication in A

Title & dedication in GE1 (→GE1a)

Title & dedication in GE2 (→GE3)

Title & dedication in FE

Title & dedication in EE1 & EE3

Title in EE2

Our suggestion

..

In the main text we give the title and dedication in accordance with the title page of the entire opus in A (we develop the Mme and Csse abbreviations used in A) and FE. In A (→GE) and FE, the particular etudes are provided with an additional title, Etude, with a corresponding ordinal number, which we represent through the number preceding the score. In EE, the numbering includes 12 Etudes, Op. 10, hence this etude is No. 13.
In GE and EE, the title includes the number of etudes in the entire Op. 25, which could be related to the division of the entire opus into two books, 6 etudes each, performed in these editions. Nothing indicates that Chopin considered this information to be important, although in other opuses including groups of pieces (MazurkasNocturnesPolonaisesPreludesWaltzes), he would generally give the number of pieces.
EE2 omits the dedication, as the individual title page was replaced with a collective one, common for all Chopin pieces published by Wessel; in EE3, the dedication was added above the score on the 1st page.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Dedications , GE revisions , Deletions in A

b. 1

composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major

No indications in AI & CDP

in A (→GE), FE & EE

..

Chopin added the tempo indication, including the metronome tempo, only at the stage of preparing the Etude for publication – in #AW they are absent. In A one can see that the metronome tempo was added (in pencil) to the already finished manuscript.

In CDP, the entire first part of the manuscript (to bar 19) is devoid of any performance markings, which almost certainly does not reflect the state of the copied manuscript (probably autograph). Due to this fact, we do not include this source in the notes discussing the performance indications.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors of CDP