mUltimate Chopin

Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 107

composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor

..

The flats restoring A and a were added in the proofreading of FE (→GE,EE).

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 107

composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor

in A & EE2

No marking in FE (→GE,EE1)
..

The omission of  in FE (→GE,EE1) can be intentional.
EE2 presumably copied the marking from bar 51 and 155.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 107

composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor

Slur in A, EE & GE2 )→GE3→GE4)

No slur in FE (→GE1)
..

FE (→GE1) omitted the slur in the L.H. It is undoubtedly an engraver's inaccuracy. Cf. the neighbouring note.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions

b. 109

composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor

in A

No marking in FE (→GE,EE)
..

As in bar 53 the absence of  in FE (→GE,EE) is most probably a result of the engraver's inattention.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 109

composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor

Slur in A, GE & EE

No slur in FE
..

FE overlooked the slur in the L.H.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions