mUltimate Chopin

Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 175

composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor

No slur in A

Slur in FE (→GE,EE)
..

A separate slur for the L.H. was added in the proofreading of FE1, most probably by Chopin.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 175

composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor

Two voices in A

One voice in FE (→GE, EE)
..

It is hard to state whether the simplified notation of the part of the R.H. in FE (→GE,EE) resulted from Chopin's proofreading or the engraver's inaccuracy. The first of these possibilities is indicated by the addition of the lento indication in FE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 175

composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor

No indication in A

in FE (→GE,EE)
..

The lento indication is undoubtedly a Chopin addition in the proofreading of FE1.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 175

composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor

Fingering written into FEJ & FES

No teaching fingering
..

Chopin added the fingering in FES, FEJ includes the same indication.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEJ