



b. 19-22
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In AI Chopin would write slurs only from time to time, which resulted from the working nature of this autograph. In the discussed section, the only slur is in bar 21 (discussed separately). category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 20-22
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
At the end of bars 20 and 22, in the main text we suggest to combine the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the fingering written in FES, probably coming from Chopin. The first of these numerals is to be found also in EE (cf. bars 19-20). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FES |
||||||||
b. 21-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
It is hard to determine whether it was Chopin that introduced the change of key marking – in [A] or proofreading FE – or it was a result of the engraver's error. The error is justified with flats before g category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 21-22
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we consider the 1st finger written in FED. The fingering, added by Fontana in EE, starts with a different numeral. Fontana suggested variant solutions for six notes in bar 19. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED |