data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
It is hard to determine whether it was Chopin that introduced the change of key marking – in [A] or proofreading FE – or it was a result of the engraver's error. The error is justified with flats before g in bar 24 and g
1 in bar 25, apparently added in FE just in print. The notation with five flats is more justified from the point of view of the harmonic flow – the key that dominates from bar 22 to the beginning of bar 25 is B
minor. In spite of this, in the main text we give the notation of FE (→GE,EE), as Chopin did not take the opportunity to correct it in a proofreading of FE. Cf. the Etude in A
major, No. 10, bars 29-31.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations
issues: Authentic corrections of FE
notation: Shorthand & other