data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
According to us, in spite of the difference in the length of the sign, in both bars the accents in AI (→FE) are to be understood as long. This is how it was understood in EE, while GE has a short accent in bar 25 and category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The octave in the R.H. is provided in FE (→EE) with a wedge in bar 25 and with a dot in bar 26. It is probably a result of misunderstanding of the notation of [A] (perhaps inaccurate). In GE1 (→GE1a) in both places there are dots, moreover, a dot was added – most probably by mistake – also over the octave in the L.H. It is hard to assume whether the omission of the signs in the R.H. in the subsequent GE is a result of a revision or of a mistake. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , Wedges |
||||||||
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |