



Pitch
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
Lack of accidentals before the 5th pair of quavers in A (→FE→EE3) means that Chopin forgot to put either a
The revisers of GE and EE4 added a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Errors of A |
|||||
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
Lack of accidentals before the 5th pair of quavers in A means that Chopin either forgot to put a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
In the main text we give the unambiguous version of A, in which the entire 2nd half of the bar is marked as a repetition of the 1st one. The version is somewhat confirmed by an analogous figure in the melodically and harmonically similar bar 24. As far as the sound is concerned, the version of FE (→GE,EE) is perfect, so it could be a result of Chopin's proofreading, yet possible traces of performing this correction are questionable. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 37-38
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
The notation of accidentals in these bars is very careless in A, although it does not lead to textual doubts. In bar 37 Chopin omitted the flats before the 1st (g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |