data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
Lack of accidentals before the 5th pair of quavers in A (→FE→EE3) means that Chopin forgot to put either a next to the 9th quaver (a
1) or a
next to the upper note of the following sixth (a2). The former possibility seems to be much more likely:
- such errors belong to the most common ones in case of Chopin (see the issue "Omissions to cancel alteration");
- in the scale melodic passages of this Etude Chopin would insert chromatic tones between the tones of the current key and not instead of them;
- in analogous bar 35 the
returning d
2 was added, probably by Chopin, in the last proofreading of FE (→EE).
The revisers of GE and EE4 added a before the upper note of the sixth.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, GE revisions, Errors of A
notation: Pitch