|
b. 17-19
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
We give the fingering added by Chopin in a proofreading of FE (→GE). In EE3 the digits in bar 17 were omitted, which was only partially and erroneously corrected in EE4. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The rhythm of AI is undoubtedly the original version of this motif, most probably changed at the time of writing A. It is indicated by gaps between the notes of this motif, corresponding to equal quavers. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Dotted or even rhythm |
||||||
|
b. 17-20
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The slur of A (→FE→GE,EE), beginning in the 2nd bar of a new phrase, was completed by Chopin in FED. We consider this addition as an improvement of notation and adopt it to the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||
|
b. 17-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
Chopin added the entire pedalling in this section of the Etude while proofreading FE (→GE,EE). See also bars 22-23, 29-32 and 33-36. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 17-18
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
Lack of dynamic indications in AI is probably a result of its working nature. However, it cannot be excluded that the idea of the phrase's dynamics, which Chopin had while writing AI, did not coincide with the final concept written later in A (→FE→GE,EE). Cf. the note on accents in bar 18. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
, 
i cresc. in