|
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The unambiguous long accent in A was interpreted in FE (→GE) as short. However, the mark in EE may be regarded as long. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||
|
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||
|
b. 21-23
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The sources are missing some of the flats before g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||
|
b. 21-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
In AI there are no verbal indications in these bars. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
|
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
Chopin's fingering in bar 22, both in the R.H. and the L.H. was added in a proofreading of FE (→GE). In EE the fingering of the L.H. was added by Fontana (also in the next bars), what is more, he changed one of the digits given by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
notes (in various octaves). None of these inaccuracies raise any doubt concerning the sound intended by Chopin. In 
