|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
A includes the indication rittenuto (sic!). In the main text we give ritard., which could be a result of Chopin's proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). In AI there are no indications in bars 8-9. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
From the graphic point of view, it is hard to consider the accent in A as long, however, it cannot be excluded that in this place the composer's intention is rendered better by the sign of AI. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
|
b. 9-15
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
In AI bar 8 is marked as 1ma [volta], after which bar 16 follows, marked as 2[da volta]. However, after bar 8, instead of the expected repeat sign, there is a double bar line. In spite of this inaccuracy, there is no doubt that bars 9-15 are meant to be repetition of bars 1-7. A double bar line appears also after bar 16. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
||||||||
|
b. 9-16
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The slurs in these bars – despite being justified from the point of view of the performance – do not appear in the sources controlled by Chopin in terms of publication (A, FE). We do not include them in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
In AI there are no verbal indications concerning dynamics, articulation or tempo. Cf. the note to bars 7-8. category imprint: Differences between sources |
