



b. 86
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
The topmost note of the last chord in the R.H. was certainly corrected in GC from a1 to b category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in GC , Alterations in GC |
|||||||||||
b. 87
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
|||||||||||
b. 88-89
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
The slur in FE, unbroken despite rests and pause, is most probably erroneous. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 89-92
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In GC bars 89-90 end the line of text. This caused the copyist to have erroneously omitted the opening part of the slur – he wrote only the ending fragment in bars 91-92. In GE this fragmentary slur was overlooked or omitted. For the joining of the slur in FE to the preceding one see the note in bar 88. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in GC , Errors of GC |
|||||||||||
b. 90
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
It is not clear what could have caused FE1 to replace the quaver d-a by the dots prolonging the preceding crotchet. In any case, the A version reinstated in the proofreading of FE2 (→FE3) proves that it was a mistake. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |