b. 18-19
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
Omission of extensions of some of the bass notes is most probably a result of the engraver's inattention or of a misinterpretation of the notation (Chopin simplified notation is formally erroneous, as the rhythmic values of these crotchets do not fit in the bar). Chopin used a similar notation also in bars 20 and 71-76. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
According to us, the missing sign in FE (→GE,EE) is most probably a result of the engraver's inattention. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
Same as in bars 18-19, we consider the lack of extensions the E note in FE (→GE,EE) as an inaccuracy. In the main text we change the second crotchet for a quaver, as the hold to the next bar is already written with a tie. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
b. 20-21
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
Lack of the mark in FE (→GE,EE) is most probably a result of the engraver's oversight. In the main text we indicate also the conventional moment of pedal release. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |