|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In the main text we give the title and dedication in the undoubtedly authentic version adopted in FE. The extensions of both the title (in GE and EE) and dedication (in EE) most probably come from the editors. See the Etude in C major, No. 1, bar 1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Dedications , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 1-5
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The detailed fingering of the first phrase in EE is an addition by Fontana. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The change of Vivace to Lento was introduced by Chopin in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). The tempo indication of this Etude is the most flagrant example of the change of concept in Chopin's pieces, although a few arguments prove that the actual deceleration of the tempo could have not been that significant as it is suggested by the transition from Vivace to Lento ma non troppo. Cf. bar 21. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
Chopin added the metronome indication at the time of proofreading FE. The value of crotchet in GE and EE is certainly erroneous – even with a quaver the tempo seems to be very fast and it has not been obeyed by the pianists for over one hundred years. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE , Metronome tempos |
|||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
