Issues : Inaccuracies in FE

b. 1

composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major

No slur in AI & FE (→GE,EE)

Slur in A

..

An accidental omission of the slur written in A in FE (→GE,EE) seems to be most plausible here.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 1

composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major

legatiss. in A

legato in FE (→EE)

legato in GE

..

In the main text we give the legatiss. written in A (in AI this indication is absent). The change to legato in FE (→GE,EE) is probably a mistake. It is not clear whether the notation of A means that the indication is valid from the beginning of the piece or from the beginning of the two-part texture in the R.H. According to us, it is the second possibility that is more plausible.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 1-3

composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major

No slur in AI & FE (→GE,EE)

Slur in A

..

The slur, dividing (among others) the parts of both hands written on the bottom stave, was omitted in the editions, probably due to graphic difficulties.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 6

composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major

 in A

 in FE (→GE,EE)

..

The fact of shortening the  hairpins in FE (→GE,EE) is certainly an arbitrary decision of the engraver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 7

composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major

No mark in AI & FE (→GE,EE)

Wedge in A

Our variant suggestion

..

The wedge written in A was most probably overlooked in FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE