b. 10-12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In A marks in bars 10 and 12 are written only on the 4th beat in the bar, on marks. According to us, the way of their arrangement is a result of the already disappearing in Chopin's times convention of writing marks inside their scope of validity (and not at the beginning). This is how it was understood in FE (→GE,EE), in which the indications were moved before the octave motifs. This phenomenon also appears in bars 50-53 and 60-63, to an even greater extent. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Centrally placed marks |
|||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
A has G as the 2nd note in the L.H., same as in the remaining analogous bars. However, the note is written a little bit too low, which probably resulted in its interpretation as F in FE (→EE3). This almost patent error was corrected in GE and EE4. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Chopin probably overlooked in this bar – cf. analogous situations in bars 53 and 63. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In the main text we give pairs of hairpins following similar figures in bar 10 and analog., as well as identical figures in bar 64. In A both bars 14 and 54, in which there are also no dynamic marks in the L.H., fall at the beginning of the line and before a pair of bars of different figuration contour and accent layout in the R.H., which could have distracted Chopin. category imprint: Editorial revisions |