|
b. 78
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Shortening the length of the f1-a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 79-80
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The slur of A is clearly inaccurate – it ends abruptly after the 3rd group of semiquavers in bar 79, yet its final range is unclear. In the main text we give a slur with which in FE the entire figuration in bars 79-80 was included (we interpret the slightly inaccurate beginning of the slur in accordance with the evident musical sense; it was understood the same in GE and EE). The slur probably corresponds to Chopin's entry in a proofreading of FE. category imprint: |
||||||
|
b. 79-81
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Lack of staccato dots at the beginning of bars 79 and 81 in the editions is most probably a result of negligence of the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
|
b. 80-81
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The slur of A runs to the end of bar 80 and this is how it was reproduced in FE (→GE), preserving the ambiguity. According to us, both natural in this context interpretations may correspond to Chopin's intention. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||
|
b. 80-81
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The visible in A dynamic indications of the phrase's ending were not included in FE (→GE,EE). We do not give them in the main text, as they describe a quite inconsequential detail, which is probably only one of a few possible solutions here; moreover, Chopin could have accepted their absence while proofreading FE. category imprint: Differences between sources |
1 third and reduction of the number of voices are unjustified arbitrary changes of the engraver or reviser of 
in 