|
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
Lack of pedalling in FE (→GE1→GE2,→EE2→EE3) seems to be a result of Chopin's oversight, therefore, in the main text we propose to complete it on the basis of the authentic pedalling in similar bar 70. This was already done in GE3 (→GE4→GE5) and EE4. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In CLI there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of CLI |
||||||||
|
b. 73-76
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In FE there are no ties sustaining the upper notes of the octaves in bars 73-74 and 75-76. According to us, the most probable explanation is a misunderstanding at the time of changing the original abbreviated notation of the octaves with the use of 8 under the upper notes for regular notation. In CLI the octaves, written in the described brief manner, are not sustained at all, which most probably is a mistake.
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Abbreviated octaves' notation |
||||||||
|
b. 73
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 74
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
Lack of the accent, undoubtedly authentic, in EE is most probably a result of the engraver's distraction (cf. bars 71-78). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
returning f1, which is an obvious error. 
